This excerpt
analyses the concept of the “male gaze” from the perspectives of
several writers throughout the 20th century, concluding
with the analogy of Michel Foucault's concept of the panopticon: a
prison in which a single watchman may be watching any of the
prisoners at any time, requiring them to assume they are always under
scrutiny. In a male-dominated society, women are in a similar
position to those hypothetical prisoners: Evans and Gamman cite
Simone de Beauvoir's descriptions of “learning to appraise her
adolescent self through male eyes” and John Berger's observation
that in our culture, the spectator is usually assumed to be male
(“Men look at women. Women watch themselves being looked at”).
The authors mention that Berger “has no model of discourse to
explain power relations” besides an “implicit” one, and argue
for Foucault's panopticon as an “explicit” model for discussing
the objectification of women (while also touching on the
objectification of men in the gay community), as opposed to looking
at the topic through a purely psychoanalytic lens – they admit
psychoanalysis has its uses, but state that it “offers an
inadequate amount of desire underlying sexualised looking” in the
discourse (“ideology is inscribed in discourse... a way of thinking
speaking, experiencing”, as Catherine Belsey wrote) that is
feminism. Evans and Gamman make it clear that women live in a society
in which they are under constant scrutiny while arguing for the
importance of analysing that fact using several different methods and
perspectives.
No comments:
Post a Comment